View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001304 | Main CAcert Website | website content | public | 2014-09-10 20:39 | 2014-10-28 13:21 |
| Reporter | felixd | Assigned To | NEOatNHNG | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | text | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | needs review | Resolution | open | ||
| Platform | Main CAcert Website | OS | N/A | OS Version | stable |
| Product Version | 2014 Q2 | ||||
| Target Version | 2014 Q3 | ||||
| Summary | 0001304: Discrepancy in wot.php?id=3 with current assurance process | ||||
| Description | I just discovered text on "CAcert Web of Trust/Rules" (AKA /wot.php?id=3) that describes the process of entering an assurance, but mismatches the current forms: "Processing After the meeting, visit the CAcert Web site's make an Assurance page and: * Enter the applicant's email address; * Compare the online information to the information recorded on the paper form; [...]" Note that due to a recent bug/patch, the Date of Birth of the assuree has to be entered to in order to view his personal data. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | Open "CAcert Web of Trust/Rules". Read the text. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Reviewed by | BenBE | ||||
| Test Instructions | Visit CAcert WOT Rules and check that the text matches the current process to assure someone. | ||||
|
|
I uploaded a patch into this github repo: https://github.com/yellowant/cacert-devel/tree/bug-1304 |
|
|
Please test and review this change. |
|
|
I went to said page. The description matches more or less the current process. But the English is hard to understand and I believe in some cases incorrect. The layout is not consistent (empty lines). The privacy-part is not correct. IF requested by an Arbitrator in a duly field arbitration case, the information on the CAP form or even the CAP form itself has to be presented to the Arbitrator or any person defined ba the Arbitrator. Regarding the fees we should add that there never should be fees for the assurance itself. The liability is not dependent on the knowledge of the assurer. An assurer IS liable in any case, as any assurer should read the AP, AH and should have shown this knowlede in the CATs, which should be renewed now and again. Also assurer should keep themselves updated on assurance matters. The assurance process description itself may have passed this test, but the page altogether fails this test. |
|
|
a newer commit changes the text according to today's telco. |
|
|
I logged into the system and went to the Rules page for the Assurances. The text is a great improvement to the original one. While I find some points where another wording may be a little bit more appropriate and would clarifiy some points some more (especially to the people we want to address with this page who are less familiar with the assurance process than most members of the software telco), I think that this is quite a good summary of the process. As this is a real improvement to the current state and as there are a lot other pressing bugs I think we should use this version. It is solves the issue of the bug. If somebody wants to do another go and has the time for it, it should be easily enough to either re-open the bug or open a new one. => OK |
|
|
The text is displayed. the links work => ok |
|
|
text is displayed -> OK links work -> OK => OK |
|
|
please review the patch. There are at least three successful tests. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-09-10 20:39 | felixd | New Issue | |
| 2014-09-10 20:43 | felixd | Relationship added | related to 0001226 |
| 2014-09-10 20:45 | felixd | Note Added: 0005001 | |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable fd85f230 |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | felixd | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable 66990b8d |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Reviewed by | => BenBE |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Test Instructions | => Visit CAcert WOT Rules and check that the text matches the current process to assure someone. |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Note Added: 0005002 | |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Assigned To | => NEOatNHNG |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Severity | minor => text |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Status | new => needs review & testing |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Product Version | => 2014 Q2 |
| 2014-09-10 21:05 | BenBE | Target Version | => 2014 Q3 |
| 2014-09-14 21:36 | Eva | Note Added: 0005006 | |
| 2014-09-14 21:37 | Eva | Note Edited: 0005006 | |
| 2014-10-07 22:04 | felixd | Note Added: 0005048 | |
| 2014-10-14 19:30 | BenBE | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable 3be9fa53 |
| 2014-10-14 19:30 | felixd | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable 1ae24983 |
| 2014-10-14 20:30 | BenBE | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable 696c90a2 |
| 2014-10-14 20:30 | felixd | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable 7c1804cb |
| 2014-10-15 16:50 | BenBE | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable e96fb125 |
| 2014-10-15 16:50 | felixd | Source_changeset_attached | => cacert-devel testserver-stable b2229842 |
| 2014-10-15 20:11 | Eva | Note Added: 0005052 | |
| 2014-10-21 19:13 | INOPIAE | Note Added: 0005064 | |
| 2014-10-21 21:05 | MartinGummi | Note Added: 0005068 | |
| 2014-10-28 13:20 | INOPIAE | Note Edited: 0005068 | |
| 2014-10-28 13:21 | INOPIAE | Note Added: 0005074 | |
| 2014-10-28 13:21 | INOPIAE | Status | needs review & testing => needs review |
