View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0000518||Main CAcert Website||account administration||public||2008-03-16 02:45||2013-01-11 17:10|
|Platform||Main CAcert Website||OS||N/A|
|Summary||0000518: Valid E-Mail addresses with specal chars are rejected|
|Description||I tried to add a email address containing a '=' into the system and got this error message:|
> Email Address given was invalid, or a test connection couldn't be made to your server, or the server rejected the email address as invalid
> Failed to make a connection to the mail server
According to my mailserver's log the server never go any connection. I think other chars then '=' may also be rejected.
|Additional Information||See the mailaddr(7) for more information or the RFC itself. Also in one of the RFCs (don't know the number but it's findable) you can find a regex that 100% conforms the RFC.|
|Tags||No tags attached.|
This is by design...
if(preg_match("/^([a-zA-Z0-9])+([a-zA-Z0-9\+\._-])*@([a-zA-Z0-9_-])+([a-zA-Z0-9\._-]+)+$/" , $email)
It does not check for = as a valid character in $email when running "checkEmail()"
I'd suggest a patch to add = to the regex, given this is deemed valid. Perhaps even replacing the current regex with the one in the RFC.
Looks like this is the "proper" regex for e-mail address verification. Anyone care to proofread?
Here is my suggested replacement for the above regex...
This should also fix the fact that our current one allows e-mail addresses to end in "." which does not comply with the RFC
I'm not making a patch because I don't have the time to fully test the changes I've made. Hopefully, someone can do that for me. Thanks.
Some work should also be done on the end since it allows for domains to end in ._- as well as 0-9... I may work on it later as well.
||We should definitely allow any RFC822 mail address through - the '+' character in gmail addresses is another one that causes problems... albeit one we already handle well.|
I just tried to create an OpenPGP key with GnuPG and the email address email@example.com , but GnuPG told me that the email address isn't valid.
Can you give examples for publically known and used email addresses with = in them?
The local part ("eric") is often a user name, but its meaning is defined by the local software. Sometimes it is
case sensitive, although that is unusual. If you see a local-part that looks like garbage, it is usually because
of a gateway between an internal e-mail system and the net, here are some examples:
(These are, respectively, an X.400 gateway, a gateway to an arbitrary internal mail system that lacks proper
internet support, an UUCP gateway, and the last one is just boring username policy.)
The GnuPG thingy:
I will test this and may open a bug at GnuPG. Normally I have all all expoert/I-know-what-I-do/... flags set because of a lot reasons. Please test with --allow-freeform-uid
I can confirm this bug still exists.
Trying to join with an email address containing slash fails with "Email Address given was invalid, or a test connection couldn't be made to your server, or the server rejected the email address as invalid
Failed to make a connection to the mail server"
Additionally, there is a web backslash escaping problem for single quote: when you try an address with a single quote in it, the returned failed form incorrectly has backslashes added. (This only happens on https://cacert1.it-sls.de/index.php and on the live server, but not on a server from the cacert-devel.git)
My test address was
Nastier addresses (with spaces, bracketed comments, backslashed double-quotes) are legal under RFC 5322. In my opinion they should be accepted
|2008-03-16 02:45||ph3||New Issue|
|2008-03-20 14:24||netsurf||Note Added: 0001044|
|2008-03-20 14:25||netsurf||Note Edited: 0001044|
|2008-03-20 15:02||netsurf||Note Edited: 0001044|
|2008-03-20 15:27||netsurf||Note Added: 0001045|
|2008-03-20 15:29||netsurf||Note Edited: 0001045|
|2008-03-31 14:08||samj||Note Added: 0001052|
|2008-10-14 14:36||ph3||Relationship added||related to 0000517|
|2009-04-07 11:09||ph3||Relationship added||has duplicate 0000714|
|2009-04-19 22:46||Sourcerer||Note Added: 0001373|
|2009-04-21 07:55||ph3||Note Added: 0001377|
|2012-05-28 17:32||JonathanL||Note Added: 0003017|
|2012-06-02 00:02||JonathanL||Note Edited: 0003017||View Revisions|
|2013-01-11 17:10||Werner Dworak||Relationship added||related to 0001097|